Apologies for the delay. I have had various real life issues crop up recently, so I've tried to quickly get some data on this board out there for those of you waiting for some news.
Ok, so here I present the initial findings from studying the colours via tests on the twin shifter board described by Barry Orlando and brought to life by Sporniket.
General Software notes:
======================
* The original test software design goal (as discussed by Sporniket and myself) was to produce a line of 14 x 16 pixel colour segments, (colour incrementing from a palette value of 1>) which are changed on a
per line/raster basis. This would then show 2800 colours per screen and therefore the full 65535 colours in less than 24 screens.
However, after testing a more rudimentary version of the code, I found that colour visibility viewing may be a bigger problem than anticipated (see below), so have sacrificed a reduced screen amount for better visibility,
as I believe it's the more important issue at this stage. Hence, there are currently only 14 x 16 pixel colour columns PER SCREEN (i.e. 14 colours per screen). I hope this is ok for now.
* I have also thought it prudent to code an identically working set of the colour test program; one version for the regular 9bpp ST palette and the other being the twin ST shifter one. This should hopefully help diagnose/confirm
any faults/issues, helping deduce that the hardware is working as required. Other than the 9bpp version being (ironically) far more elaborate to code, the two are identical, other than the colour value increment routines.
* Regarding STe: The twin shifter palette bit significance/positioning has been designed, it seems, with STe compatibility in mind:
GRGBRRRRGGGGBBBB
R_analog = -1--2543
G_analog = 0-1-----2543
B_analog = ---1--------2543
Therefore, the twin shifter version of the software should show identical colour position results to a regular STe, up to the 4095 colour limit anyway, so can be used to confirm correct colour values up to this point.
* All testing/pictures produced on a Mega 4 ST with twin shifter mod and a C=1084 CRT, along with Hatari v2.3.1 Windows64 version emulating standard Mega ST and STe machines.
Testing the colour differences:
==============================
9bpp vs 12bpp vs 16bpp:
======================
* As the regular 9bpp shifter will be visually more difficult to show that it cannot handle a higher bitplane colour amount, we have to look at the more striking methods for confirmation of palette depth differences:
* On the 16bpp prg, the regular ST shifter will produce a black (0,0,0) or a previously displayed (repeated) colour whenever the 4th and/or 8th bit of the palette colour value are set (as I have not coded any bit transform routines to avoid null bits like on the 9bpp version). The Twin shifter will however, show a valid colour for this position, as (like the STe) all the lower 12 bits are used for RGB colour information.
This can be seen immediately on the first screen (albeit with difficulty) as the 8th colour bar being black on the regular shifter:

- MST1.JPG (28.57 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
Whereas on the twin shifter, the image is a (hard to see) dark blue:

- TS1.JPG (76.53 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
STe version matches the twin shifter:

- STE1.JPG (30.29 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
Other colours which show the difference are colour 128/bit 8 and colour 136/bits 8 and 4 (2nd and 10th colours from left on page 10):

- MST2.JPG (35.83 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
And the twin shifter version:

- TS2.JPG (68.88 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
STe version again, matching the twin shifter:

- STE2.JPG (35.41 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
* Unfortunately, the lack of colours on the regular 9bpp shifter won't manifest differences in an easy to see way (did I say the regular shifter doesn't easily let on that it cannot display >512 colours?) and will only really be seen by a SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT set of colours on the twin shifter ST, than that displayed on the regular ST, when the count goes over the 511 colour value. (The regular ST can still increase the colour value and set unused bits higher in the full 16 bit colour field, it's just that they will be null and other repeated colours further down will still be producing repeated colours over the 512 limit.
Anyway, the colour difference can be shown (if you have good eyes!) starting on page 147; colours 2045-2058 (4th colour in) onwards, once the 512 colour limit of the regular ST have produced all the unique colours. (Any further colours on regular shifter are just repeats):
Regular shifter:

- MST3v2.JPG (34.29 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
Twin shifter: (Note: Zoomed in and digitally enhanced to show red content of the colour bar (which is evident here):

- TS3v2.JPG (36.82 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
STe version matching twin shifter one:

- STE3v2.JPG (35.08 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
I know it's very hard to see the differences (hence one of the reasons I decided to leave the more visible single, larger columns of colour in the program for the time being), so I have also included a colour analysis of the two (MegaST and STe) screen shots above, showing that the twin shifter and STe colours actually start to include some element of red, whereas the similar looking MegaST version does not:
Regular Shifter:

- MST3.JPG (51.38 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
STe:

- STE3.JPG (76.48 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
As I am using an emulator vs a CRT, visually distinguishing between the slight variance in colour at 12bpp on a TFT screen and 16bpp on an old CRT is next to impossible, while colour picking from two sources which are not in any way calibrated with each other is a more error prone task too. So perhaps some digital image enhancement to boost the red levels on the twin shifter picture and prove there is red after the 4th colour on page 147:

- TS3v3.jpg (82.04 KiB) Viewed 3083 times
Continuing higher up the colour scale proves inconclusive between the poor colour matching of the emulated Ste and the CRT display of the twin shifter, but what the hell::
Page 1000:
MegaST:

- MST4.JPG (35.23 KiB) Viewed 3182 times

- MST4v2.JPG (22.55 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
Twin Shifter:
SEE NEXT POST FOR THIS IMAGE!!!
STe:

- STE4.JPG (27.32 KiB) Viewed 3182 times

- STE4v2.JPG (26.48 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
Page 4680:
MegaST:

- MST5.JPG (35.71 KiB) Viewed 3182 times

- MST5v2.JPG (22.1 KiB) Viewed 3182 times
Twin Shifter:
SEE NEXT POST FOR THIS IMAGE!!
STe:

- STE5.JPG (35.59 KiB) Viewed 3182 times

- STE5v2.JPG (23.44 KiB) Viewed 3119 times
ST 9bpp vs 9bpp on twin shifter:
===============================
So far I have dealt with ways to produce/prove the existence of extra colours on the twin shifter. However, we must also look at any hardware errors that may manifest in accurately producing those colours. This is where I pause for feedback from the HW gurus.

I confess, I have yet to bypass the RGB resistors to the shifter on the mainboard (which is the next task and for me, personally in my situation, the hardest thing by far

), but from what I can see apart from a slightly murkier than normal black level, is some 'chroma noise' in the solid colours, (also on the green desktop); some colours even exhibiting different colour bars/bit values in the colour blocks.
If you can think of any HW adjustments that need doing, perhaps I can kill two birds with one stone and get them done when the resistor bridges are getting done.
Anyway, not a really deep write up, but it's a start! A better comparison may be picking better contrasting colours when digitally enhanced or better still, running the MegaST without the board and with the board on a TFT display. But that's a thing for next time.
Any comments or noticed errors in my writeup are welcome.